Nr. 2/2024PAOLO PALUMBO Revocation of eligibility for teaching the Catholic religion. The TAR addresses (and resolves) the question of competent jurisdiction
Nr. 2/2024SARA BERENGAN The Hon Fox Odoi vs Attorney General case: the Anti- homosexuality Act before the Ugandan Constitutional Court. Criticisms and elements for reflection.
ABSTRACT
The contribution analyses the case that led to the decision of the Second Section of the Council of State no. 2567 of 2024, which declared unlawful the ordinance of a mayor imposing to display the crucifix in all municipal offices. After analyzing the first-instance ruling and briefly setting out the findings of the ruling of the United Sections of the Supreme Court on the display of crucifixes in school premises, the work concludes by criticizing the way in which the Council of State used the principles set forth by the United Sections in order to declare the unlawfulness of the mayor’s ordinance.
KEYWORDS
Secularity; Religious symbols; Crucifix; Reasonable accommodation; Power of ordinance
