{"id":10736,"date":"2023-03-11T08:24:36","date_gmt":"2023-03-11T07:24:36","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.rivistadirittoereligioni.com\/?p=10736"},"modified":"2023-03-12T17:51:33","modified_gmt":"2023-03-12T16:51:33","slug":"bottoni-divieto-di-discriminazione-pdf","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.rivistadirittoereligioni.com\/en\/bottoni-divieto-di-discriminazione-pdf\/","title":{"rendered":"Quaderno monografico n. 2<br><b>ROSSELLA BOTTONI <\/b> <br> The prohibition of discrimination and the definition of protected philosophical belief in the United Kingabstract This essay examines two recent judgments by the employment tribunal in the Uni- ted Kingdom (Campbell and Casamitjana Costa) concerning respectively a vegetarian and a vegan. The two decisions are compared and contrasted from the perspective of the prohibition of discrimination, in the light of the definitional issue posed by the notion of \u201cprotected philosophical belief\u201d.dom: comparing vegetarianism and veganism"},"content":{"rendered":"","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3204,3225],"tags":[3342,3344,3343],"class_list":["post-10736","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-qm2-en","category-rossella-bottoni-en","tag-protected-philosophical-belief","tag-veganism","tag-vegetarianism"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v26.8 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Quaderno monografico n. 2ROSSELLA BOTTONI   The prohibition of discrimination and the definition of protected philosophical belief in the United Kingabstract This essay examines two recent judgments by the employment tribunal in the Uni- ted Kingdom (Campbell and Casamitjana Costa) concerning respectively a vegetarian and a vegan. The two decisions are compared and contrasted from the perspective of the prohibition of discrimination, in the light of the definitional issue posed by the notion of \u201cprotected philosophical belief\u201d.dom: comparing vegetarianism and veganism - Rivista Diritto e Religioni<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.rivistadirittoereligioni.com\/en\/bottoni-divieto-di-discriminazione-pdf\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Quaderno monografico n. 2ROSSELLA BOTTONI   The prohibition of discrimination and the definition of protected philosophical belief in the United Kingabstract This essay examines two recent judgments by the employment tribunal in the Uni- ted Kingdom (Campbell and Casamitjana Costa) concerning respectively a vegetarian and a vegan. The two decisions are compared and contrasted from the perspective of the prohibition of discrimination, in the light of the definitional issue posed by the notion of \u201cprotected philosophical belief\u201d.dom: comparing vegetarianism and veganism - Rivista Diritto e Religioni\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.rivistadirittoereligioni.com\/en\/bottoni-divieto-di-discriminazione-pdf\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Rivista Diritto e Religioni\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2023-03-11T07:24:36+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2023-03-12T16:51:33+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"dirittoreligioni\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"dirittoreligioni\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.rivistadirittoereligioni.com\/en\/bottoni-divieto-di-discriminazione-pdf\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.rivistadirittoereligioni.com\/en\/bottoni-divieto-di-discriminazione-pdf\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"dirittoreligioni\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.rivistadirittoereligioni.com\/#\/schema\/person\/c77b60c1cc9afc90664ba218695efebd\"},\"headline\":\"Quaderno monografico n. 2 ROSSELLA BOTTONI The prohibition of discrimination and the definition of protected philosophical belief in the United Kingabstract This essay examines two recent judgments by the employment tribunal in the Uni- ted Kingdom (Campbell and Casamitjana Costa) concerning respectively a vegetarian and a vegan. The two decisions are compared and contrasted from the perspective of the prohibition of discrimination, in the light of the definitional issue posed by the notion of \u201cprotected philosophical belief\u201d.dom: comparing vegetarianism and veganism\",\"datePublished\":\"2023-03-11T07:24:36+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-03-12T16:51:33+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.rivistadirittoereligioni.com\/en\/bottoni-divieto-di-discriminazione-pdf\/\"},\"wordCount\":81,\"keywords\":[\"Protected philosophical belief\",\"Veganism\",\"Vegetarianism\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Monographic Book nr. 2\",\"ROSSELLA BOTTONI\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.rivistadirittoereligioni.com\/en\/bottoni-divieto-di-discriminazione-pdf\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.rivistadirittoereligioni.com\/en\/bottoni-divieto-di-discriminazione-pdf\/\",\"name\":\"Quaderno monografico n. 2 ROSSELLA BOTTONI The prohibition of discrimination and the definition of protected philosophical belief in the United Kingabstract This essay examines two recent judgments by the employment tribunal in the Uni- ted Kingdom (Campbell and Casamitjana Costa) concerning respectively a vegetarian and a vegan. The two decisions are compared and contrasted from the perspective of the prohibition of discrimination, in the light of the definitional issue posed by the notion of \u201cprotected philosophical belief\u201d.dom: comparing vegetarianism and veganism - Rivista Diritto e Religioni\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.rivistadirittoereligioni.com\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2023-03-11T07:24:36+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-03-12T16:51:33+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.rivistadirittoereligioni.com\/#\/schema\/person\/c77b60c1cc9afc90664ba218695efebd\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.rivistadirittoereligioni.com\/en\/bottoni-divieto-di-discriminazione-pdf\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.rivistadirittoereligioni.com\/en\/bottoni-divieto-di-discriminazione-pdf\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.rivistadirittoereligioni.com\/en\/bottoni-divieto-di-discriminazione-pdf\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.rivistadirittoereligioni.com\/en\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Quaderno monografico n. 2ROSSELLA BOTTONI The prohibition of discrimination and the definition of protected philosophical belief in the United Kingabstract This essay examines two recent judgments by the employment tribunal in the Uni- ted Kingdom (Campbell and Casamitjana Costa) concerning respectively a vegetarian and a vegan. The two decisions are compared and contrasted from the perspective of the prohibition of discrimination, in the light of the definitional issue posed by the notion of \u201cprotected philosophical belief\u201d.dom: comparing vegetarianism and veganism\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.rivistadirittoereligioni.com\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.rivistadirittoereligioni.com\/\",\"name\":\"Rivista Diritto e Religioni\",\"description\":\"Rivista semestrale diritto e religioni\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.rivistadirittoereligioni.com\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.rivistadirittoereligioni.com\/#\/schema\/person\/c77b60c1cc9afc90664ba218695efebd\",\"name\":\"dirittoreligioni\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.rivistadirittoereligioni.com\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/cf9aa4473933e625683e24d0fc3bb3c81c679871188c5c6790a351600dbd8b34?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/cf9aa4473933e625683e24d0fc3bb3c81c679871188c5c6790a351600dbd8b34?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"dirittoreligioni\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Quaderno monografico n. 2ROSSELLA BOTTONI   The prohibition of discrimination and the definition of protected philosophical belief in the United Kingabstract This essay examines two recent judgments by the employment tribunal in the Uni- ted Kingdom (Campbell and Casamitjana Costa) concerning respectively a vegetarian and a vegan. The two decisions are compared and contrasted from the perspective of the prohibition of discrimination, in the light of the definitional issue posed by the notion of \u201cprotected philosophical belief\u201d.dom: comparing vegetarianism and veganism - Rivista Diritto e Religioni","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.rivistadirittoereligioni.com\/en\/bottoni-divieto-di-discriminazione-pdf\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Quaderno monografico n. 2ROSSELLA BOTTONI   The prohibition of discrimination and the definition of protected philosophical belief in the United Kingabstract This essay examines two recent judgments by the employment tribunal in the Uni- ted Kingdom (Campbell and Casamitjana Costa) concerning respectively a vegetarian and a vegan. The two decisions are compared and contrasted from the perspective of the prohibition of discrimination, in the light of the definitional issue posed by the notion of \u201cprotected philosophical belief\u201d.dom: comparing vegetarianism and veganism - Rivista Diritto e Religioni","og_url":"https:\/\/www.rivistadirittoereligioni.com\/en\/bottoni-divieto-di-discriminazione-pdf\/","og_site_name":"Rivista Diritto e Religioni","article_published_time":"2023-03-11T07:24:36+00:00","article_modified_time":"2023-03-12T16:51:33+00:00","author":"dirittoreligioni","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"dirittoreligioni"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.rivistadirittoereligioni.com\/en\/bottoni-divieto-di-discriminazione-pdf\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.rivistadirittoereligioni.com\/en\/bottoni-divieto-di-discriminazione-pdf\/"},"author":{"name":"dirittoreligioni","@id":"https:\/\/www.rivistadirittoereligioni.com\/#\/schema\/person\/c77b60c1cc9afc90664ba218695efebd"},"headline":"Quaderno monografico n. 2 ROSSELLA BOTTONI The prohibition of discrimination and the definition of protected philosophical belief in the United Kingabstract This essay examines two recent judgments by the employment tribunal in the Uni- ted Kingdom (Campbell and Casamitjana Costa) concerning respectively a vegetarian and a vegan. The two decisions are compared and contrasted from the perspective of the prohibition of discrimination, in the light of the definitional issue posed by the notion of \u201cprotected philosophical belief\u201d.dom: comparing vegetarianism and veganism","datePublished":"2023-03-11T07:24:36+00:00","dateModified":"2023-03-12T16:51:33+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.rivistadirittoereligioni.com\/en\/bottoni-divieto-di-discriminazione-pdf\/"},"wordCount":81,"keywords":["Protected philosophical belief","Veganism","Vegetarianism"],"articleSection":["Monographic Book nr. 2","ROSSELLA BOTTONI"],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.rivistadirittoereligioni.com\/en\/bottoni-divieto-di-discriminazione-pdf\/","url":"https:\/\/www.rivistadirittoereligioni.com\/en\/bottoni-divieto-di-discriminazione-pdf\/","name":"Quaderno monografico n. 2 ROSSELLA BOTTONI The prohibition of discrimination and the definition of protected philosophical belief in the United Kingabstract This essay examines two recent judgments by the employment tribunal in the Uni- ted Kingdom (Campbell and Casamitjana Costa) concerning respectively a vegetarian and a vegan. The two decisions are compared and contrasted from the perspective of the prohibition of discrimination, in the light of the definitional issue posed by the notion of \u201cprotected philosophical belief\u201d.dom: comparing vegetarianism and veganism - Rivista Diritto e Religioni","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.rivistadirittoereligioni.com\/#website"},"datePublished":"2023-03-11T07:24:36+00:00","dateModified":"2023-03-12T16:51:33+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.rivistadirittoereligioni.com\/#\/schema\/person\/c77b60c1cc9afc90664ba218695efebd"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.rivistadirittoereligioni.com\/en\/bottoni-divieto-di-discriminazione-pdf\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.rivistadirittoereligioni.com\/en\/bottoni-divieto-di-discriminazione-pdf\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.rivistadirittoereligioni.com\/en\/bottoni-divieto-di-discriminazione-pdf\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.rivistadirittoereligioni.com\/en\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Quaderno monografico n. 2ROSSELLA BOTTONI The prohibition of discrimination and the definition of protected philosophical belief in the United Kingabstract This essay examines two recent judgments by the employment tribunal in the Uni- ted Kingdom (Campbell and Casamitjana Costa) concerning respectively a vegetarian and a vegan. The two decisions are compared and contrasted from the perspective of the prohibition of discrimination, in the light of the definitional issue posed by the notion of \u201cprotected philosophical belief\u201d.dom: comparing vegetarianism and veganism"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.rivistadirittoereligioni.com\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.rivistadirittoereligioni.com\/","name":"Rivista Diritto e Religioni","description":"Rivista semestrale diritto e religioni","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.rivistadirittoereligioni.com\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.rivistadirittoereligioni.com\/#\/schema\/person\/c77b60c1cc9afc90664ba218695efebd","name":"dirittoreligioni","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.rivistadirittoereligioni.com\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/cf9aa4473933e625683e24d0fc3bb3c81c679871188c5c6790a351600dbd8b34?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/cf9aa4473933e625683e24d0fc3bb3c81c679871188c5c6790a351600dbd8b34?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"dirittoreligioni"}}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rivistadirittoereligioni.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10736","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rivistadirittoereligioni.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rivistadirittoereligioni.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rivistadirittoereligioni.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rivistadirittoereligioni.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=10736"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/www.rivistadirittoereligioni.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10736\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":11035,"href":"https:\/\/www.rivistadirittoereligioni.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10736\/revisions\/11035"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rivistadirittoereligioni.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=10736"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rivistadirittoereligioni.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=10736"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rivistadirittoereligioni.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=10736"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}