{"id":10726,"date":"2023-03-10T22:52:56","date_gmt":"2023-03-10T21:52:56","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.rivistadirittoereligioni.com\/graziani-liberta-di-religione-pdf\/"},"modified":"2023-03-12T17:43:21","modified_gmt":"2023-03-12T16:43:21","slug":"graziani-liberta-di-religione-pdf","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.rivistadirittoereligioni.com\/en\/graziani-liberta-di-religione-pdf\/","title":{"rendered":"Quaderno monografico n. 2<br><b>FRANCESCA GRAZIANI <\/b> <br> Freedom of religion and margin of appreciation in the decisions of the European Court of Human Rights and the UN Committee on Human Rightsabstract Concerning the right to manifest one\u2019s religion, unlike the European Court of Human Rights, the UN Committee on Human Rights does not give States a margin of appreciation in the fulfilment of Article 18 of the Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. Differences in \u201ccase law\u201d entail risks of double standards of protection and weaken the authority of the two human rights supervisory bodies. The article therefore highlights the strengths and weaknesses of the decisions of the European Court and of the UN Committee and the lessons they could learn from each other."},"content":{"rendered":"","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3221,3204],"tags":[3331,3330,3332],"class_list":["post-10726","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-francesca-graziani-en","category-qm2-en","tag-european-court-of-human-rights","tag-freedom-of-religion-and-margin-of-appreciation","tag-un-committee-on-human-rights"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v26.8 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Quaderno monografico n. 2FRANCESCA GRAZIANI   Freedom of religion and margin of appreciation in the decisions of the European Court of Human Rights and the UN Committee on Human Rightsabstract Concerning the right to manifest one\u2019s religion, unlike the European Court of Human Rights, the UN Committee on Human Rights does not give States a margin of appreciation in the fulfilment of Article 18 of the Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. Differences in \u201ccase law\u201d entail risks of double standards of protection and weaken the authority of the two human rights supervisory bodies. The article therefore highlights the strengths and weaknesses of the decisions of the European Court and of the UN Committee and the lessons they could learn from each other. - Rivista Diritto e Religioni<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.rivistadirittoereligioni.com\/en\/graziani-liberta-di-religione-pdf\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Quaderno monografico n. 2FRANCESCA GRAZIANI   Freedom of religion and margin of appreciation in the decisions of the European Court of Human Rights and the UN Committee on Human Rightsabstract Concerning the right to manifest one\u2019s religion, unlike the European Court of Human Rights, the UN Committee on Human Rights does not give States a margin of appreciation in the fulfilment of Article 18 of the Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. Differences in \u201ccase law\u201d entail risks of double standards of protection and weaken the authority of the two human rights supervisory bodies. The article therefore highlights the strengths and weaknesses of the decisions of the European Court and of the UN Committee and the lessons they could learn from each other. - Rivista Diritto e Religioni\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.rivistadirittoereligioni.com\/en\/graziani-liberta-di-religione-pdf\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Rivista Diritto e Religioni\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2023-03-10T21:52:56+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2023-03-12T16:43:21+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"dirittoreligioni\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"dirittoreligioni\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.rivistadirittoereligioni.com\/en\/graziani-liberta-di-religione-pdf\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.rivistadirittoereligioni.com\/en\/graziani-liberta-di-religione-pdf\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"dirittoreligioni\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.rivistadirittoereligioni.com\/#\/schema\/person\/c77b60c1cc9afc90664ba218695efebd\"},\"headline\":\"Quaderno monografico n. 2 FRANCESCA GRAZIANI Freedom of religion and margin of appreciation in the decisions of the European Court of Human Rights and the UN Committee on Human Rightsabstract Concerning the right to manifest one\u2019s religion, unlike the European Court of Human Rights, the UN Committee on Human Rights does not give States a margin of appreciation in the fulfilment of Article 18 of the Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. Differences in \u201ccase law\u201d entail risks of double standards of protection and weaken the authority of the two human rights supervisory bodies. The article therefore highlights the strengths and weaknesses of the decisions of the European Court and of the UN Committee and the lessons they could learn from each other.\",\"datePublished\":\"2023-03-10T21:52:56+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-03-12T16:43:21+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.rivistadirittoereligioni.com\/en\/graziani-liberta-di-religione-pdf\/\"},\"wordCount\":122,\"keywords\":[\"European Court of Human Rights\",\"Freedom of religion and Margin of appreciation\",\"UN Committee on Human Rights\"],\"articleSection\":[\"FRANCESCA GRAZIANI\",\"Monographic Book nr. 2\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.rivistadirittoereligioni.com\/en\/graziani-liberta-di-religione-pdf\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.rivistadirittoereligioni.com\/en\/graziani-liberta-di-religione-pdf\/\",\"name\":\"Quaderno monografico n. 2 FRANCESCA GRAZIANI Freedom of religion and margin of appreciation in the decisions of the European Court of Human Rights and the UN Committee on Human Rightsabstract Concerning the right to manifest one\u2019s religion, unlike the European Court of Human Rights, the UN Committee on Human Rights does not give States a margin of appreciation in the fulfilment of Article 18 of the Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. Differences in \u201ccase law\u201d entail risks of double standards of protection and weaken the authority of the two human rights supervisory bodies. The article therefore highlights the strengths and weaknesses of the decisions of the European Court and of the UN Committee and the lessons they could learn from each other. - Rivista Diritto e Religioni\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.rivistadirittoereligioni.com\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2023-03-10T21:52:56+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2023-03-12T16:43:21+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.rivistadirittoereligioni.com\/#\/schema\/person\/c77b60c1cc9afc90664ba218695efebd\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.rivistadirittoereligioni.com\/en\/graziani-liberta-di-religione-pdf\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.rivistadirittoereligioni.com\/en\/graziani-liberta-di-religione-pdf\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.rivistadirittoereligioni.com\/en\/graziani-liberta-di-religione-pdf\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.rivistadirittoereligioni.com\/en\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Quaderno monografico n. 2FRANCESCA GRAZIANI Freedom of religion and margin of appreciation in the decisions of the European Court of Human Rights and the UN Committee on Human Rightsabstract Concerning the right to manifest one\u2019s religion, unlike the European Court of Human Rights, the UN Committee on Human Rights does not give States a margin of appreciation in the fulfilment of Article 18 of the Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. Differences in \u201ccase law\u201d entail risks of double standards of protection and weaken the authority of the two human rights supervisory bodies. The article therefore highlights the strengths and weaknesses of the decisions of the European Court and of the UN Committee and the lessons they could learn from each other.\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.rivistadirittoereligioni.com\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.rivistadirittoereligioni.com\/\",\"name\":\"Rivista Diritto e Religioni\",\"description\":\"Rivista semestrale diritto e religioni\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.rivistadirittoereligioni.com\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.rivistadirittoereligioni.com\/#\/schema\/person\/c77b60c1cc9afc90664ba218695efebd\",\"name\":\"dirittoreligioni\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.rivistadirittoereligioni.com\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/cf9aa4473933e625683e24d0fc3bb3c81c679871188c5c6790a351600dbd8b34?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/cf9aa4473933e625683e24d0fc3bb3c81c679871188c5c6790a351600dbd8b34?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"dirittoreligioni\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Quaderno monografico n. 2FRANCESCA GRAZIANI   Freedom of religion and margin of appreciation in the decisions of the European Court of Human Rights and the UN Committee on Human Rightsabstract Concerning the right to manifest one\u2019s religion, unlike the European Court of Human Rights, the UN Committee on Human Rights does not give States a margin of appreciation in the fulfilment of Article 18 of the Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. Differences in \u201ccase law\u201d entail risks of double standards of protection and weaken the authority of the two human rights supervisory bodies. The article therefore highlights the strengths and weaknesses of the decisions of the European Court and of the UN Committee and the lessons they could learn from each other. - Rivista Diritto e Religioni","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.rivistadirittoereligioni.com\/en\/graziani-liberta-di-religione-pdf\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Quaderno monografico n. 2FRANCESCA GRAZIANI   Freedom of religion and margin of appreciation in the decisions of the European Court of Human Rights and the UN Committee on Human Rightsabstract Concerning the right to manifest one\u2019s religion, unlike the European Court of Human Rights, the UN Committee on Human Rights does not give States a margin of appreciation in the fulfilment of Article 18 of the Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. Differences in \u201ccase law\u201d entail risks of double standards of protection and weaken the authority of the two human rights supervisory bodies. The article therefore highlights the strengths and weaknesses of the decisions of the European Court and of the UN Committee and the lessons they could learn from each other. - Rivista Diritto e Religioni","og_url":"https:\/\/www.rivistadirittoereligioni.com\/en\/graziani-liberta-di-religione-pdf\/","og_site_name":"Rivista Diritto e Religioni","article_published_time":"2023-03-10T21:52:56+00:00","article_modified_time":"2023-03-12T16:43:21+00:00","author":"dirittoreligioni","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"dirittoreligioni"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.rivistadirittoereligioni.com\/en\/graziani-liberta-di-religione-pdf\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.rivistadirittoereligioni.com\/en\/graziani-liberta-di-religione-pdf\/"},"author":{"name":"dirittoreligioni","@id":"https:\/\/www.rivistadirittoereligioni.com\/#\/schema\/person\/c77b60c1cc9afc90664ba218695efebd"},"headline":"Quaderno monografico n. 2 FRANCESCA GRAZIANI Freedom of religion and margin of appreciation in the decisions of the European Court of Human Rights and the UN Committee on Human Rightsabstract Concerning the right to manifest one\u2019s religion, unlike the European Court of Human Rights, the UN Committee on Human Rights does not give States a margin of appreciation in the fulfilment of Article 18 of the Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. Differences in \u201ccase law\u201d entail risks of double standards of protection and weaken the authority of the two human rights supervisory bodies. The article therefore highlights the strengths and weaknesses of the decisions of the European Court and of the UN Committee and the lessons they could learn from each other.","datePublished":"2023-03-10T21:52:56+00:00","dateModified":"2023-03-12T16:43:21+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.rivistadirittoereligioni.com\/en\/graziani-liberta-di-religione-pdf\/"},"wordCount":122,"keywords":["European Court of Human Rights","Freedom of religion and Margin of appreciation","UN Committee on Human Rights"],"articleSection":["FRANCESCA GRAZIANI","Monographic Book nr. 2"],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.rivistadirittoereligioni.com\/en\/graziani-liberta-di-religione-pdf\/","url":"https:\/\/www.rivistadirittoereligioni.com\/en\/graziani-liberta-di-religione-pdf\/","name":"Quaderno monografico n. 2 FRANCESCA GRAZIANI Freedom of religion and margin of appreciation in the decisions of the European Court of Human Rights and the UN Committee on Human Rightsabstract Concerning the right to manifest one\u2019s religion, unlike the European Court of Human Rights, the UN Committee on Human Rights does not give States a margin of appreciation in the fulfilment of Article 18 of the Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. Differences in \u201ccase law\u201d entail risks of double standards of protection and weaken the authority of the two human rights supervisory bodies. The article therefore highlights the strengths and weaknesses of the decisions of the European Court and of the UN Committee and the lessons they could learn from each other. - Rivista Diritto e Religioni","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.rivistadirittoereligioni.com\/#website"},"datePublished":"2023-03-10T21:52:56+00:00","dateModified":"2023-03-12T16:43:21+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.rivistadirittoereligioni.com\/#\/schema\/person\/c77b60c1cc9afc90664ba218695efebd"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.rivistadirittoereligioni.com\/en\/graziani-liberta-di-religione-pdf\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.rivistadirittoereligioni.com\/en\/graziani-liberta-di-religione-pdf\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.rivistadirittoereligioni.com\/en\/graziani-liberta-di-religione-pdf\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.rivistadirittoereligioni.com\/en\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Quaderno monografico n. 2FRANCESCA GRAZIANI Freedom of religion and margin of appreciation in the decisions of the European Court of Human Rights and the UN Committee on Human Rightsabstract Concerning the right to manifest one\u2019s religion, unlike the European Court of Human Rights, the UN Committee on Human Rights does not give States a margin of appreciation in the fulfilment of Article 18 of the Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. Differences in \u201ccase law\u201d entail risks of double standards of protection and weaken the authority of the two human rights supervisory bodies. The article therefore highlights the strengths and weaknesses of the decisions of the European Court and of the UN Committee and the lessons they could learn from each other."}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.rivistadirittoereligioni.com\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.rivistadirittoereligioni.com\/","name":"Rivista Diritto e Religioni","description":"Rivista semestrale diritto e religioni","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.rivistadirittoereligioni.com\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.rivistadirittoereligioni.com\/#\/schema\/person\/c77b60c1cc9afc90664ba218695efebd","name":"dirittoreligioni","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.rivistadirittoereligioni.com\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/cf9aa4473933e625683e24d0fc3bb3c81c679871188c5c6790a351600dbd8b34?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/cf9aa4473933e625683e24d0fc3bb3c81c679871188c5c6790a351600dbd8b34?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"dirittoreligioni"}}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rivistadirittoereligioni.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10726","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rivistadirittoereligioni.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rivistadirittoereligioni.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rivistadirittoereligioni.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rivistadirittoereligioni.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=10726"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/www.rivistadirittoereligioni.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10726\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":11031,"href":"https:\/\/www.rivistadirittoereligioni.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10726\/revisions\/11031"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.rivistadirittoereligioni.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=10726"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rivistadirittoereligioni.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=10726"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.rivistadirittoereligioni.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=10726"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}