{"version":"1.0","provider_name":"Rivista Diritto e Religioni","provider_url":"https:\/\/www.rivistadirittoereligioni.com\/en\/","author_name":"dirittoreligioni","author_url":"https:\/\/www.rivistadirittoereligioni.com\/en\/author\/dirittoreligioni\/","title":"Quaderno monografico n. 2ROSSELLA BOTTONI   The prohibition of discrimination and the definition of protected philosophical belief in the United Kingabstract This essay examines two recent judgments by the employment tribunal in the Uni- ted Kingdom (Campbell and Casamitjana Costa) concerning respectively a vegetarian and a vegan. The two decisions are compared and contrasted from the perspective of the prohibition of discrimination, in the light of the definitional issue posed by the notion of \u201cprotected philosophical belief\u201d.dom: comparing vegetarianism and veganism - Rivista Diritto e Religioni","type":"rich","width":600,"height":338,"html":"<blockquote class=\"wp-embedded-content\" data-secret=\"DAjkxukMXJ\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.rivistadirittoereligioni.com\/en\/bottoni-divieto-di-discriminazione-pdf\/\">Quaderno monografico n. 2<br><b>ROSSELLA BOTTONI <\/b> <br> The prohibition of discrimination and the definition of protected philosophical belief in the United Kingabstract This essay examines two recent judgments by the employment tribunal in the Uni- ted Kingdom (Campbell and Casamitjana Costa) concerning respectively a vegetarian and a vegan. The two decisions are compared and contrasted from the perspective of the prohibition of discrimination, in the light of the definitional issue posed by the notion of \u201cprotected philosophical belief\u201d.dom: comparing vegetarianism and veganism<\/a><\/blockquote><iframe sandbox=\"allow-scripts\" security=\"restricted\" src=\"https:\/\/www.rivistadirittoereligioni.com\/en\/bottoni-divieto-di-discriminazione-pdf\/embed\/#?secret=DAjkxukMXJ\" width=\"600\" height=\"338\" title=\"&#8220;Quaderno monografico n. 2&lt;br&gt;&lt;b&gt;ROSSELLA BOTTONI &lt;\/b&gt; &lt;br&gt; The prohibition of discrimination and the definition of protected philosophical belief in the United Kingabstract This essay examines two recent judgments by the employment tribunal in the Uni- ted Kingdom (Campbell and Casamitjana Costa) concerning respectively a vegetarian and a vegan. The two decisions are compared and contrasted from the perspective of the prohibition of discrimination, in the light of the definitional issue posed by the notion of \u201cprotected philosophical belief\u201d.dom: comparing vegetarianism and veganism&#8221; &#8212; Rivista Diritto e Religioni\" data-secret=\"DAjkxukMXJ\" frameborder=\"0\" marginwidth=\"0\" marginheight=\"0\" scrolling=\"no\" class=\"wp-embedded-content\"><\/iframe><script type=\"text\/javascript\">\n\/* <![CDATA[ *\/\n\/*! This file is auto-generated *\/\n!function(d,l){\"use strict\";l.querySelector&&d.addEventListener&&\"undefined\"!=typeof URL&&(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&&!\/[^a-zA-Z0-9]\/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret=\"'+t.secret+'\"]'),c=new RegExp(\"^https?:$\",\"i\"),i=0;i<o.length;i++)o[i].style.display=\"none\";for(i=0;i<a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&&(s.removeAttribute(\"style\"),\"height\"===t.message?(1e3<(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r<200&&(r=200),s.height=r):\"link\"===t.message&&(r=new URL(s.getAttribute(\"src\")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&&n.host===r.host&&l.activeElement===s&&(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener(\"message\",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener(\"DOMContentLoaded\",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll(\"iframe.wp-embedded-content\"),r=0;r<s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute(\"data-secret\"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+=\"#?secret=\"+t,e.setAttribute(\"data-secret\",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:\"ready\",secret:t},\"*\")},!1)))}(window,document);\n\/\/# sourceURL=https:\/\/www.rivistadirittoereligioni.com\/wp-includes\/js\/wp-embed.min.js\n\/* ]]> *\/\n<\/script>\n"}